Oklahoma southwestern electric power company and west texas utilities company petitioners v federal energy regulatory commission respondent arkansas electric cooperative corp houston lighting power company city of san antonio lower colorado river authority and dallas power light company et al intervenors. Appalachian power company et al petitioners v russell e train as administrator environmental protectionagency respondentalabama power company et al intervenors 545 f2d 1351 4th cir 1976 case opinion from the us court of appeals for the fourth circuit. United states court of appealsdistrict of columbia circuit east texas electric cooperative inc et al petitioners v federal energy regulatory commission respondent central power and light company et al intervenors. 4 after the supreme courts decision in e i dupont de nemours co v train 430 us 112 97 sct 965 51 led2d 204 1977 we modified our decision in appalachian power to exclude the requirement of a variance for new sources but declined to modify the opinion further7 in march 1978 epa proposed its amendment to the bpt variance provision 43 fr 8812 13 1978. Florida power light company petitioner v joette lorion etc et al united states nuclear regulatory commission and united states petitioners v
How it works:
1. Register Trial Account.
2. Download The Books as you like ( Personal use )